Medical
Information
Full Information
about Your Health
 
Asthma and Other
Allergic Diseases
Behavior and Mental
Health Issues
Birth Defects and Other
Congenital Conditions
Breast and Bottle Feeding
Child Abuse
Child Care
Childhood Illnesses
Dental Health
Diabetes and Other
Endocrine Conditions
Ear Infections
Environmental Health
Especially for Teens
Eye Care and Conditions
Family Issues
Growth and Development
Infant Care
Infectious Disease
and Immunization
Learning Disabilities
Premature Infants
Prenatal and
Newborn Care
Sexuality
Skin Care
Sleep Issues
Youth Violence
Blood Disorders
Complementary and
Alternative Medicine
Fitness and Nutrition
Medical Tests
and Medications
Pain Management
Physical Medicine
and Rehabilitation
Plastic Surgery,
Cosmetic and
Reconstructive Procedures
Preventive Medicine
Online Pharmacy
generic viagra online

A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING IV IRON SUCROSE TO ORAL IRON IN ANEMIC PATIENTS WITH NONDIALYSIS-DEPENDENT CKD

Van Wyck DB, Roppolo M, Martinez CO, Mazey RM, McMurray S; for the United States Iron Sucrose (Venofer) Clinical Trials Group.

Kidney Int. 2005 Dec;68(6):2846-56.

Background

Although iron deficiency frequently complicates anemia in patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD (ND-CKD), the comparative treatment value of IV iron infusion and oral iron supplementation has not been established.

Methods

In a randomized, controlled multicenter trial, we compared the efficacy of iron sucrose, given as 1 g in divided IV doses over 14 days, with that of ferrous sulfate, given 325 mg orally thrice daily for 56 days in patients with ND-CKD stages 3 to 5, Hb < or =11 g/dL, TSAT < or =25%, and ferritin < or =300 ng/mL. Epoetin/darbepoetin therapy, if any, was not changed for eight weeks prior to or during the study.

Results

The proportion of patients achieving the primary outcome (Hb increase > or =1 g/dL) was greater in the IV iron treatment group than in the oral iron treatment group (44.3% vs. 28.0%, P= 0.0344), as was the mean increase in Hb by day 42 (0.7 vs. 0.4 g/dL, P= 0.0298). Compared to those in the IV iron group, patients in the oral iron treatment group showed a greater decline in GFR during the study (-4.40 vs. -1.45 mL/min/1.73m2, P= 0.0100). No serious adverse drug events (ADE) were seen in patients administered IV iron sucrose as 200 mg IV over two to five minutes, but drug-related hypotension, including one event considered serious, occurred in two females weighing less than 65 kg after 500 mg doses were given over four hours.

Conclusion

IV iron administration using 1000 mg iron sucrose in divided doses is superior to oral iron therapy in the management of ND-CKD patients with anemia and low iron indices.

ITO rating/ comment

In this randomized, controlled trial, Van Wyck et al. compare the efficacy of 1 g of IV iron sucrose to 325 mg of ferrous sulphate in nondialysis-dependent CKD patients. 44.3% of patients in the IV iron treatment group achieved a hemoglobin (Hb) increase ? 1g/dL compared to 28% in the oral iron treatment group (p = 0.0298). The authors conclude that 1000 mg of IV iron sucrose is more effective than oral iron in managing CKD-associated anemia in patients not on dialysis.


Home Page | For Medical Specialists | For Patients | Medications | Price List | Contact Details
© 2008 http://medinforms.com. All Rights Reserved